(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump is on the brink of learning whether the US Supreme Court will bless two of his most audacious gambits, his bids to oust a Federal Reserve governor and roll back automatic birthright citizenship.
Most Read from Bloomberg
The justices are scheduled to rule on both issues as they release the final seven rulings of their term this week. Trump in each case is seeking to topple a longstanding national pillar – the principle that anyone born on US soil is an American in one and the independence of the Fed in the other.
The justices will take the bench at least twice to deliver opinions, starting Monday at 10:00 a.m. Washington time. As is typical, the final cases are among the biggest and most controversial.
Fed Governor Firing
They include Trump’s effort to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook over mortgage fraud allegations that she denies. Although the high court will decide only whether Trump can remove Cook temporarily while she fights for her job, the case could have far-reaching implications for the Fed’s independence as it sets interest rates.
A Trump victory might open a path for him to remove other governors who haven’t heeded his calls to slash interest rates, perhaps even letting the president reshape the central bank by ousting and replacing officials. Trump has openly mused about firing Jerome Powell, who remains on the Fed’s Board of Governors even though his term as chair has expired.
During arguments in January, the justices suggested they were reluctant to let Trump remove Cook before she had a chance to contest the allegations and challenge the ouster.
“It seems likely the court is going to rule against the administration,” University of Chicago law professor William Baude said in a call with reporters this month, though he said it wasn’t clear how much the court would say about the underlying legal issues.
The court has already dealt one major defeat to Trump this term with the Feb. 20 ruling that struck down his sweeping global tariffs.
‘Independent’ Agencies
Trump may fare better in a connected case that could put the president firmly in control of two dozen other federal agencies that had once been independent. In a dispute involving a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, Trump argues that his constitutional authority means he generally can fire top officials at executive-branch agencies for any reason – even if Congress has created job protections for those roles.
Story Continues
Trump is asking the court to overturn a 91-year-old precedent that laid the legal groundwork for the modern administrative state. That would be a blockbuster decision, though the court has already signaled its ruling won’t apply to the Fed.
Birthright Citizenship
The birthright citizenship case might join Cook as a second blow to Trump this week. The president is asking the court to roll back the longstanding consensus that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment and two federal statutes guarantee citizenship to almost everyone born on US soil.
Trump’s executive order would restrict birthright citizenship to babies with at least one parent who is a US citizen or green-card holder, affecting an estimated 250,000 children born to undocumented immigrants and temporary visitors each year.
During arguments in April, Chief Justice John Roberts scoffed at contentions by an administration lawyer that so-called birth tourism had created a “new world” that undercut the historic understanding.
“Well, it’s a new world,” Roberts said. “It’s the same Constitution.”
Trump has previously scored significant victories for his immigration agenda at the conservative-dominated court. His administration won two cases Thursday, including a ruling that lets the administration end temporary protections for people from potentially 13 crisis-stricken countries. The ruling directly affects more than 350,000 Haitians and Syrians, many of whom now could be swiftly deported.
Election Issues
Two other pending Supreme Court clashes promise to affect the country’s election laws in advance of the November midterms. The court is weighing Republican calls to invalidate longstanding federal limits on spending by political parties in coordination with candidates.
The justices are also considering GOP arguments for requiring mail ballots to arrive by Election Day in order to count in federal races. If adopted, that position would wipe out grace periods in 29 states across the country.
Trans Athletes
And in a high-profile culture war clash, the court will decide whether state laws can ban transgender girls and women from competing for their schools on female athletic teams. A ruling upholding bans in West Virginia and Idaho would add to a string of losses in recent years for transgender people and LGBTQ rights more broadly.
–With assistance from Christopher Cannon.
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
©2026 Bloomberg L.P.
