News US

Lawyers, guns and money: SCOTUS considers firearms and the Federal Reserve

Welcome back, Deadline: Legal Newsletter readers. This week’s Supreme Court hearings can be summed up with the title of Warren Zevon’s classic tune “Lawyers, Guns and Money.” The court heard arguments about a Hawaii gun law and President Donald Trump’s bid to fire a Federal Reserve member. The Trump administration wants the gun law gone. The hearings suggested its view might prevail in the Second Amendment case but not in the Fed case.

The gun case featured an unusual dynamic, with the court’s Republican appointees harping on the racist nature of an 1865 Louisiana law. They did so because the court’s recent Second Amendment precedent says that gun laws can’t stand unless they’re consistent with the nation’s historical tradition, and Hawaii invoked the old law to defend its modern measure.

Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch said the old law was “part of an effort, it appears, to disarm Black people,” and fellow GOP appointee Samuel Alito said it wanted to put Black people “at the mercy of racist law enforcement officers.” Alito wondered why it wasn’t “the height of irony to cite a law that was enacted for exactly the purpose of preventing someone from exercising the Second Amendment right, to cite this as an example of what the Second Amendment protects.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson suggested the problem was with the court’s new precedent itself, namely the historical tradition test laid out in the 2022 case, called Bruen. “I guess I’m wondering whether that doesn’t signal a problem with the Bruen test, that to the extent that we have a test that relates to historical regulation, but all of the history of regulation is not taken into account, I think there might be something wrong with the test,” the Biden appointee said at Tuesday’s hearing in Wolford v. Lopez.

Although the court seemed to walk back the Bruen precedent in a 2024 case, which allowed gun restrictions for domestic violence perpetrators, the Hawaii law looks like it might be on the way out. The challengers to the law told the justices that California, Maryland, New Jersey and New York have bans similar to Hawaii’s, which bars carrying concealed guns onto private property that’s open to the public without the property owner’s permission.

Jordan Rubin

Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MS NOW, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button