Exactly a year ago, two days before his first White House meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the biggest cut to U.K. international assistance in history. Twelve months on, the evidence is in: The decision has failed on its own terms.
The manifesto-breaking reduction — around 40% in real terms, worth roughly £6 billion ($8.1 billion) a year — was devised by a small inner circle in Downing Street and rushed out ahead of the White House trip, justified as the price of higher defense spending.
Despite hardworking officials at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office trying to enact the decision in full without even more devastating consequences for human lives, the reductions now underway should be halted and subjected to a serious review before further damage is done.
This article is free to read – just register or sign in
Access news, newsletters, events and more.
Join usSign in
Printing articles to share with others is a breach of our terms and conditions and copyright policy. Please use the sharing options on the left side of the article. Devex Pro members may share up to 10 articles per month using the Pro share tool ( ).
