Listen to this article
Estimated 3 minutes
The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.
An Alberta Court of King’s Bench justice has quashed Elections Alberta’s approval of a petition seeking a referendum on Alberta independence from separatist group Stay Free Alberta.
The decision puts the future of the independence petition, which Stay Free Alberta said has garnered more than 300,000 names, in question.
In two decisions issued Wednesday, Justice Shaina Leonard found that chief electoral officer Gordon McClure made an error in law to approve the second citizen’s initiative petition and failed to consider an earlier decision that said separation would violate Treaty rights.
Leonard’s conclusion says there was an error of law, “rendering the [chief electoral officer]’s decision unreasonable.”
She also found that the government, as representative of the Crown, failed in its duty to consult with applicants Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Blood Tribe, Piikani Nation, and Siksika Nation.
Stay Free Alberta collected signatures between Jan. 2 and May 2. Mitch Sylvestre, leader of the group, delivered the petition to Elections Alberta’s Edmonton office on May 4.
Jeff Rath, one of Sylvestre’s lawyers, was unhappy with Leonard’s decision.
“We disagree fundamentally with the decision which appears on its face to violate principles of natural justice and contain numerous errors of law,” he wrote on X.
“We have been instructed to prepare and file the appropriate appellate documents.”
Premier Danielle Smith said in question period that she would have more to say on the judge’s ruling after she has a chance to read it.
“We will be reviewing the results of this judgment and then making some decisions,” she said. “We obviously have a number of different processes that are ongoing right now.”
Injunction rejected
In a separate decision released Wednesday, Leonard denied an injunction request from another First Nation to stop the petition.
The Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation argued the government violated Treaty 8 by changing the law to make it easier for the separation petition to proceed.
It also alleged increases in racism and misinformation from the petition process, but the judge was not satisfied that “the observed increases in that regard are attributable to the [citizen initiative] process, Bill 14 or the second proposal itself.”
Leonard said the evidence didn’t meet a legal test to prove irreparable harm if the injunction wasn’t granted.
Orlagh O’Kelly, lawyer for the SLCN, said her clients are disappointed and are reviewing the decision to see if there are any next steps.
Chief Sheldon Sunshine said while SLCN lost the case, they changed the discussion.
“Many Albertans know that this secession cannot happen without breaching Treaties, and many more Albertans are aware of foreign interference because of this case,” he said.
