Bitcoin’s recent struggles to rise in tandem with U.S. stocks have sparked a wave of explanations, from concerns about Michael Saylor’s (MSTR) bitcoin selling to questions about whether institutional demand is beginning to fade.
The crypto asset has lost more than 16% of its value in the past month, while U.S. stocks — the S&P 500 is up 5% over the same period — have climbed to all-time highs.
For years, the two asset classes tended to move in the same general direction, but that relationship has broken down. Even so, many market participants are asking why bitcoin has failed to rally alongside recent industry developments and the surge in interest surrounding topics like tokenization.
Charles Schwab director of digital currencies research and strategy Jim Ferraioli sees a simple explanation: Bitcoin is losing the momentum trade.
“Bitcoin has been in a bear market since October,” Ferraioli said in an interview, noting the massive crash in late last year, right after reaching a new all-time high.
“Not to say it’s as simple as that, but it’s kind of simple as that,” he added.
‘MOMO’ chasing
The comments stand in contrast to a market narrative that has remained largely focused on positive developments. Over the past year, crypto has secured spot ETF approvals, attracted billions of dollars in institutional capital and moved closer to regulatory clarity in Washington.
Yet despite those developments, bitcoin has struggled to sustain the type of explosive rally many investors expected. Instead, capital has been flowing elsewhere.
“We found a bottom in early February, and since then another large Wall Street firm had a successful ETF launch, and so you saw this kind of return to the institutional adoption narrative,” Ferraioli said.
That rebound helped bitcoin recover from its February lows. But unlike previous crypto cycles, the recovery fizzled before developing into a broad speculative frenzy.
That’s because crypto investors are not fundamentally driven, but chase momentum, Ferraioli noted. In his view, bitcoin’s problem isn’t a lack of bullish news. It’s the competition.
Historically, crypto has benefited when it becomes the market’s most compelling speculative opportunity. When prices rise, traders pile in. When another asset class begins attracting attention, capital often follows. This is called momentum or MOMO chasing
“Crypto investors historically just go wherever the momentum is,” Ferraioli said. “And momentum is out of crypto at the moment.”
While the destinations for that capital have changed over the past year from gold to commodities to equities, the most dominant growth narrative that has been sucking out most of the capital currently is artificial intelligence (AI).
The AI boom has created a new class of speculative opportunities that didn’t exist in previous crypto cycles. Public companies tied to AI infrastructure, data centers, and advanced computing have generated strong returns, while anticipated IPOs from firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic have become focal points for investors seeking the next growth story.
Adding to the competition for investor capital, Elon Musk’s SpaceX is preparing an IPO that could value the company at as much as $1.8 trillion, while a wave of other high-profile listings could raise more than $200 billion, drawing liquidity away from other risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
The IPO ‘Hype’
The effect is not limited to traditional markets. According to Ferraioli, crypto traders are also getting caught up in the rush surrounding potential blockbuster IPOs. He pointed to activity on decentralized exchange Hyperliquid (HYPE), where traders can gain exposure to synthetic contracts tied to private pre-IPO shares.
Instead of allocating capital to bitcoin or other digital assets, some traders are using those products to speculate on companies expected to go public. In Ferraioli’s view, that shift reflects how investor attention and capital are increasingly drawn toward anticipated IPOs, even in crypto markets.
“I think people that are excited about momentum are getting excited about IPOs,” he said. “Then some of these you can actually access the private shares on these decentralized exchanges on Hyperliquid.”
That trend is significant because it highlights how crypto-native trading infrastructure is increasingly enabling investors to speculate on assets beyond cryptocurrencies. Platforms such as Hyperliquid (HYPE) have introduced perpetual contracts tied to private companies, commodities and other non-crypto assets, giving traders new places to deploy capital.
For bitcoin, that means it is no longer competing solely against other cryptocurrencies. It is competing against every major speculative narrative in the market.
It’s not Saylor
Ferraioli also downplayed concerns surrounding Strategy’s recent sale of 32 bitcoin, a transaction that sparked debate among investors because of Saylor’s long-standing reputation as one of bitcoin’s most committed advocates.
“The narrative has been that they’ll never sell,” Ferraioli said. Yet he believes the market impact of the transaction itself has been overstated. “But I don’t think [the sale] is what’s really driving it [bitcoin selloff],” he said.
Instead, he views the sale as a convenient narrative attached to a broader trend that was already underway.
Part of that trend may be tied to investor cost bases, and many ETF investors are still recovering from sharp swings over the past year and see the current price point as an opportunity to exit positions rather than increase them.
“I think you get to those levels and you get people that are saying, ‘Hey, I made my money back, maybe I’ll revisit it later,'” Ferraioli said.
In fact, on May 26, there was a massive $1.26 billion block sale of BlackRock’s IBIT bitcoin ETF off-exchange. NYDIG research labeled the move as a large investor seeking a rapid exit from bitcoin exposure rather than the unwinding of a common hedge-fund trading strategy.
That dynamic has contributed to a market that feels very different from the euphoric phases of previous cycles.
Ferraioli argues that institutional adoption, while real, remains smaller than many market participants assume. Bitcoin ETFs have expanded access to crypto, but much of the asset class remains dominated by retail investors and momentum-driven traders.
“Again, this is primarily a retail asset,” he said.
The distinction matters because retail investors often react differently from traditional institutional allocators. Rather than building positions based on discounted cash flow models or long-term valuation frameworks, they tend to chase trends.
That behavior helps explain why bitcoin has struggled to capitalize on positive regulatory developments.
The crypto industry is awaiting potential passage of the Clarity Act, a bill that many industry participants believe could provide a clearer framework for digital assets in the U.S. Over the longer term, Ferraioli believes such developments could support adoption.
In the short term, however, regulation alone may not be enough to reverse the current trend.
“There is still more demand for downside protection,” he noted elsewhere in Schwab’s market outlook, though that pressure has begun to ease in recent weeks.
Seasonality may also be contributing to the slowdown. Summer has historically been one of bitcoin’s weaker periods, as trading activity declines and investors shift attention elsewhere.
“People know that for bitcoin seasonally, summer is the weakest time,” Ferraioli said. That leaves the market in an awkward position.
So, is there any catalyst that can save the market? According to Ferraioli, no.
Institutional adoption is improving. Regulatory clarity is advancing. Major financial firms continue building crypto products. Yet, none of those developments guarantees higher prices if investor attention is focused elsewhere.
For now, he argues, the biggest challenge facing bitcoin isn’t Saylor, regulation or even macroeconomics. It’s that investors have found something else to chase.
“There’s a lack of a reason to be buying here when there’s other things you can choose,” Ferraioli said.
