MLB proposes draft overhaul: No high school players, age 20 minimum

These MLB stadium snacks are stealing home on social media
Major league baseball stadiums are stepping up to the plate with some seriously viral food and souvenir merch.
Major League Baseball is seeking to radically overhaul the amateur draft that would eliminate players from being immediately drafted out of high school, requiring them to be at least 20 years old, in their latest proposal to the players union Thursday that the union blasted.
“MLB made another set of proposals that are flat-out bad for baseball, ones that would cripple the next generation of players and damage the future of our game,” Bruce Meyer, interim executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association, said in a statement.
MLB’s proposal, which would begin in 2028, would require players to be at least 20 years old by Sept. 1 of their draft year, and at least two years after their high school graduation. MLB is also seeking to reduce the draft from 20 rounds to 12 rounds with a $200 million draft pool – a reduction from $358.7 million – while also implementing a 12-round international draft.
The proposal was called “the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard in my life,” by one veteran agent, with one MLB scouting director saying, “let’s just kill the game!”
MLB’s proposal would eliminate more than $1 billion in player compensation from the international and domestic system over the next five years, with a $400 million reduction in 2026-2027, Meyer said. He also believes it would “destroy fundamental player rights and remove talent from our sport by barring high school and junior college players (anyone under age 20) from the domestic draft.” And delaying international signings until September 2027 would be “denying young international players the ability to start their professional careers.”
“MLB has sent a edict to all teams development and scouting departments,” powerful agent Scott Boras said. “They are not worthy of developing young players.”
Boras continued: “They are berating franchises, they are berating players, and berating the game for even suggesting this.”
The proposal would incentivize players to attend college, MLB says, allowing them to develop in college while still being paid with NIL funds. Players wouldn’t necessarily need to be an active college player but could be drafted after playing in independent baseball or an MLB Draft League. In return, MLB would lower the qualification for college players to be drafted after their sophomore season instead of their junior year.
MLB lauds the success of collegiate programs, saying it has become “become increasingly central to developing future Major Leaguers” with 75% of MLB players having played in college.
Yet, several MLB scouts told USA TODAY Sports that they vehemently disagree, and that the new draft eligibility would be a detriment to the development of players.
“College baseball is not set up for development,” one scouting director said. “It’s to win games. So many freshmen don’t even get to play.”
Said Boras: “Any good college coach plays their seniors and juniors so this group going to college would not be playing. These older players will be taking up their playing time. That’s why we have professional choices. You’re playing 60 games in college. Playing professionally, you learn how to play 140 games. You learn how to psychologically survive the game.”
While Boras and others insist the new proposal is designed strictly to save money and assure that players won’t be able to hit free agency early to capitalize on their skills, MLB says that the college ranks will prepare players quicker to make the transition to MLB.
“Over the last several years, college baseball has undergone a remarkable transformation,” MLB said in a statement. “Expanded scholarships, NIL opportunities, revenue sharing, and significant investments in facilities and player development have made college baseball an increasingly important pathway that is producing major league-ready talent at an accelerated rate. Today’s top programs provide players with resources, competition, and national exposure that were unimaginable a decade ago.
“Our proposal is designed to build on that momentum to benefit the game at the college, minor league and major league levels. By creating a draft system centered around college-aged players and making most college players eligible one year earlier, more players will benefit from both a college education and an elite development environment while reaching professional baseball – and ultimately the major leagues – more quickly. We believe these changes will strengthen college baseball and deepen fans’ connection to the next generation of major league stars.”
MLB said that if their proposal is implemented, 86% of the top-40 college selections in the 2025 draft would have been eligible a year earlier under the new eligibility rules.
The new draft would also enable teams to trade first-round picks for the first time since the draft was implemented in 1965, but not in consecutive years. No club would be allowed to accrue more than three extra picks within the first three rounds of a draft. It also would require at least 10 players to attend the MLB Draft, and would receive a $50,000 draft bonus. There wasn’t a single first-round pick last year that attended the draft.
The proposal would not reduce the number of minor-league teams, which currently is at 120, MLB said, through at least 2030. MLB also is lowering the draft lottery selections from six to four, with no team eligible to receive a lottery selection for three consecutive years.
MLB also wants to implement a 12-round international draft. The international draft, which was proposed in the 2021 CBA in return for eliminating qualifying offers for free agents, would be 12 rounds and restricted to players who are at least 18 years old, with a signing-bonus pool of $200 million for 360 international players.
International players who aren’t drafted would be limited to a maximum $10,000 signing bonus while receiving a $30,000 bonus once they complete a full minor-league season.
Yet, as several MLB executives point out, the proposal means that kids born in the United States would actually be penalized, having to wait two years longer than international players to sign MLB contracts.
“It is long past time to reform the international amateur system in ways that would address longstanding challenges and benefit future players,” MLB said in a statement. “The enhanced transparency of the International Draft that we are proposing is a common-sense step forward that best addresses the root causes of corruption in the current system.
“Our vision for the new international system reduces the pressure on young athletes by giving them the chance to grow and develop, keeps kids in school longer while they pursue a career in baseball, and creates more playing opportunities for the older players who are left behind in today’s system.”
The draft would help diminish the corruption in foreign countries, MLB says, with teams reaching deals with kids who are 10 years or older, which has resulted in falsifying birth certificates with performance-enhancing drugs becoming more rampant. MLB also would implement an international scouting and medical combine for the top 300 international prospects.
The union believes MLB wants an international draft strictly as a cost-saving measure for clubs, just like the reasoning for a reduced domestic draft that would delay kids from entering the draft. The later they enter the draft, the later they hit free agency. The later they hit free agency, the older they’ll be. And the older they’ll be, the less money they’ll be paid.
Juan Soto signed with the Washington Nationals at 16, reached the big leagues at 19, and is the game’s highest-paid player with a $765 million contract. Vladimir Guerrero Jr., who was signed by the Toronto Blue Jays at 16, signed a 14-year, $500 million contract when he was 26. Bryce Harper was drafted first in the county when he was 17, reached free agency at 26 years old, and signed for $330 million with the Phillies.
“Almost all of our top-level players in this game,” Boras said, “teams invested in when they were young. That’s what this is all about. It’s about money. It’s not about the betterment of the game. They want them to be older in the game so they can create ceilings.”
If the draft is reduced once again, with age restrictions and a hard slot, Boras predicts it will drive young athletes to other sports.
“Barring American boys of choices and representation will certainly redirect the best youth athletes to other sports,” Boras said. “Franchises built their futures on the (Bobby) Witts, (Gunnar) Hendersons and (Elly) De La Cruzes, and in past drafts the (Bryce) Harpers, (Ken) Griffeys, A-Rods, and now they deny those players and teams the right of choice.
“NBA, NHL and international soccer is so happy about this decision as they offer youth choices for great athletes.”
Follow Bob Nightengale on X at @Bnightengale




