Maryland’s Deepfake Ban Proposal Faces First Amendment Challenges

Maryland’s proposed deepfake ban, House Bill 145 (HB 145), is garnering significant attention amidst concerns over its potential First Amendment implications. The bill aims to criminalize certain AI-generated content, particularly “deepfakes” that are related to elections. Proposed penalties include a misdemeanor charge with fines up to $5,000 and the possibility of five years in prison for violations.
First Amendment Concerns
Many believe HB 145 threatens free speech by allowing the state to label lawful political expression as criminal disinformation. Critical perspectives argue that categorizing deepfakes under vague guidelines could lead to misuse of power, essentially chilling political discourse in Maryland.
Legal Implications of HB 145
While the bill does include an exception for parody and satire, critics caution that this provision may enable the government to scrutinize the intent behind deepfake content. Such oversight could result in unwarranted prosecutions, further stifling creative expression.
Alternative Approaches to Regulation
Advocates for reform suggest looking to Utah’s House Bill 329 as a more effective model. This bill implements a disclosure-based approach, focusing on clearly defined paid political advertisements. Key features include:
- Mandatory disclosure for political operatives utilizing AI in advertisements.
- A targeted regulation that minimizes interference with personal expression.
- Increased clarity for compliance and enforcement within existing campaign finance frameworks.
Such an approach could better safeguard individual rights while addressing the risks associated with AI in political advertising.
Call for Legislative Change
As deliberations continue, there is a pressing need for Maryland legislators to pivot away from the potentially unconstitutional elements of HB 145. Instead, lawmakers are encouraged to refine existing campaign laws to protect both individuals and free speech. Only through thoughtful regulation can the balance between innovation and constitutional rights be achieved in Maryland.




