Skyline of Toronto, Ontario at night. Photo: Taxiarchos228, FAL, via Wikimedia Commons
Ontario’s controversial ticket resale crackdown is moving closer to becoming law, with Bill 97 — the province’s omnibus budget measure — now at third reading following debate on April 22 and a deferred vote on final passage listed on the Legislature’s April 23 orders paper.
The bill includes amendments to the provinces 2017 Ticket Sales Act which would prohibit secondary‑market ticket sales above the total price originally paid to the primary seller, plus applicable fees, service charges, and taxes. Critics argue the proposal is advancing rapidly and with limited scrutiny despite warnings that resale price caps could harm consumers, undermine regulated marketplaces, and further entrench the power of dominant primary ticketing companies.
That looming advance has sparked a renewed wave of criticism from consumer‑side opponents of resale caps, led by Sports Fans Coalition, which says more than 10,000 Ontarians have contacted Premier Doug Ford and their Members of Provincial Parliament urging the government to strip the ticketing provisions from the budget bill.
In a release issued April 23, the group said the measure is being pushed ahead “with no debate” at the committee stage and warned that the policy would do more to constrain compliant resale marketplaces than to restrain dominant primary ticketing players.
Advertisement
Your browser does not support HTML5 video.
“Over 10,000 Ontarians have taken action, throwing a penalty flag on the Government’s ticket price cap proposal,” Sports Fans Coalition executive director Brian Hess said in the release. “As the Premier pushes this legislation through without any public conversation, we are making sure that fan voices are heard loud and clear, imploring Premier Ford: don’t fumble our tickets by passing price caps.”
The legislative vehicle itself has become a focal point of the criticism. Rather than advancing as a standalone ticketing bill, the resale restrictions are embedded within the broader Bill 97 budget package. The official bill summary states that Schedule 16 would bar tickets from being sold or facilitated on the secondary market above the total price paid to the primary seller, require proof of that original total price before a platform can facilitate a listing, and impose new recordkeeping obligations on secondary marketplaces.
That language is broader and more operationally specific than the early public messaging around the proposal, a distinction central to the arguments now being raised by opponents. As earlier reporting highlighted, this language would mean that consumers won’t be able to recover what they themselves paid if they purchased tickets at market value and later needed to resell. With price caps on the actual final sale price, and the fees charged by the resale marketplace also likely to take a cut, consumers forced to resell tickets in this new ecosystem will almost certainly take a loss on the resale of any tickets that they cannot use, while primary sales are subject to no comprable price fixing regulations.
Sports Fans Coalition has built much of its opposition campaign around that consumer‑impact argument. The group said its analysis found that across Toronto’s four major professional sports teams, fans saved more than $10 million from 2021 through 2025 by buying resale tickets below face value, and that nearly 43% of Blue Jays resale tickets sold below face during that period. It argued that a hard price cap would undermine the very marketplaces where those discounted transactions occur, while doing nothing to directly constrain pricing power on the primary side.
Advertisement
Your browser does not support HTML5 video.
“Ontario’s ticket resale price caps are straight out of Ticketmaster’s playbook,” Hess said. “When you tell fans they can’t independently resell tickets, we end up more dependent on Ticketmaster. That’s not consumer protection. That’s monopoly protection.”
That line of attack echoes broader concerns previously raised about the Ford government’s proposal. Live Nation, the parent company of Ticketmaster, quickly voiced support for Ontario’s resale crackdown — a posture that critics say should raise red flags given the company’s history of antitrust scrutiny in the United States and longstanding arguments that resale‑only restrictions can strengthen dominant incumbents by shrinking one of the few remaining competitive channels outside the primary onsale.
The timing has only amplified those concerns. The Ontario push comes just days after a U.S. jury found Live Nation had violated federal antitrust law, a development that critics argue underscores the risk of policies that further consolidate pricing power in ticketing rather than increase competitive pressure.
Opponents have also pointed to Ford’s own past position on the issue. In 2019, Ontario backed away from an earlier resale‑cap framework after concluding that such rules were difficult to enforce and risked driving transactions into the black market. That reversal has featured prominently in present‑day criticism, with opponents arguing the province is reviving a policy it once deemed unworkable. TicketNews’ earlier coverage highlighted that history when the new crackdown was unveiled in March.
In Thursday’s release, Sports Fans Coalition said fraud risk remains central to its concerns. The group argued that when regulated resale marketplaces are constrained, ticket transactions do not disappear but instead migrate to informal channels such as social platforms, private handoffs, or other less‑protected environments.
“Premier Ford was right in 2019,” Hess said, calling resale caps unenforceable and likely to increase fraud. “The facts haven’t changed — the politics have.”
Bill 97’s legislative path has reinforced complaints about speed. The bill was introduced March 26, passed second reading April 2, discharged from committee and ordered to third reading April 21, and debated at third reading April 22 before the final vote was deferred. The Legislature’s April 23 orders paper lists that deferred third‑reading vote as pending.
The second‑reading vote highlighted the partisan alignment behind the measure’s advance, with the government carrying the motion 66–37, according to legislative status information and voting records published by the province.
If enacted, Schedule 16 would not only cap resale prices. It would require secondary sellers to provide proof of a ticket’s original total price before listing through a platform, mandate disclosure of both the original and resale prices to buyers, compel platforms to retain records for at least three years after an event, and authorize future regulations governing resale‑side fees and service charges.
Supporters frame those measures as enhanced consumer protection. Opponents counter that the more tightly Ontario regulates compliant resale platforms, the more likely price‑sensitive or time‑pressed fans are to turn to less‑regulated alternatives. With Bill 97 now nearing final passage, that long‑running dispute is rapidly shifting from a policy debate to a practical test of how Ontario’s ticketing market will function in the years ahead.
