The problem with the White House’s pardon process: There doesn’t appear to be a process

Last fall, during a briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, “When it comes to pardons, the White House takes them with the utmost seriousness.” Donald Trump’s top spokesperson added that each pardon is subjected to “a very thorough review process,” conducted by a team of “qualified lawyers.”
I continue to believe this was one of the more unintentionally amusing things Leavitt has ever said.
In fact, NOTUS published a report this week, based on accounts from multiple sources familiar with the White House’s pardon process, who described a chaotic system in which clemency is often extended to those with the right access, to the right people, with the right “narrative.” From the article:
More than a year in, the White House’s pardon process remains a puzzle for those trying to navigate, and in some cases profit, from it. The nearly dozen people who NOTUS spoke with — including sources both outside the Trump administration, like lawyers and lobbyists, and inside the White House — described an ever-changing situation. Many said it is predicated on who has access and who can create the most appealing stories for their clients.
Someone directly involved in the pardon process told NOTUS, “There is no process, there is no right way to do this. It’s chaos.”
To be sure, the same NOTUS report included White House denials, including an insider who wanted to assure the public that there’s “a defined process” in place.
Recommended
Steve Benen
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
Latest Post
- FBI reportedly lowers standards for agents, adding to an unfortunate pattern




